← Past problems

HiMCM 2011 · Problem set

An aerospace logistics problem paired with a search-and-rescue planning problem. Problem A asks teams to design a ten-year strategy for resupplying and crewing the International Space Station after the July 2011 retirement of the Space Shuttle — choosing a portfolio of launch vehicles, costing the cargo manifest, and producing a year -by-year schedule through ISS's then-planned 2020 decommissioning. Problem B asks teams to plan a nighttime flashlight search through a wooded park, first for a small lost item and then for a possibly-injured jogger, modeling detection probability and recommending a search pattern under a fixed time budget.

Contest datesNovember 11 – November 21, 2011 (extended weekend window) [illustrative]
Participation~400 teams, predominantly United States and China [illustrative]
Problem ANo More Space Shuttles — ten-year ISS resupply/crew strategy, launch-vehicle portfolio, cost & manifest plan through 2020
Problem BSearch and Find — nighttime penlight search of a wooded park; detection model, sweep-width estimation, time-budgeted plan for a small object and for a lost jogger
Official results 2011 HiMCM problems & commentary
Both 2011 prompts are indexed on COMAP's previous problems page. Read the official statement before our outline — the outline is most useful as a second pass.

The two problems

Why this year is good practice

  • Two very different model archetypes. A is a long-horizon logistics & portfolio-optimization problem with hard integer constraints (you cannot launch half a rocket); B is a probabilistic search-theory problem rooted in sweep-width and lateral- range curves. Together they cover capacity planning and detection under uncertainty.
  • Real public data. ISS resupply manifests, vehicle payload masses, and unit launch costs are all publicly documented by NASA, ESA, JAXA and Roscosmos. Search- theory benchmarks come from the U.S. Coast Guard's National Search and Rescue Supplement and Koopman's foundational 1956 papers.
  • Two non-technical deliverables. A demands a briefing-grade plan that a NASA administrator can defend on Capitol Hill; B demands a one-page operational note the ranger can hand to volunteer searchers. Strong papers nail the executive paragraph and one chart a non-modeler can read in 30 seconds.